Scalia uses curious reasoning trying to recreate apartheid state

In Arizona dissent, Scalia blasts Obama’s deportation stay, immigration policies http://m.yahoo.com/w/legobpengine/news/blogs/ticket/arizona-dissent-scalia-blasts-obama-deportation-stay-immigration-185431255.html?orig_host_hdr=news.yahoo.com&.intl=US&.lang=en-US

The federal government “does not want to enforce the immigration laws as written, and leaves the States’ borders unprotected against immigrants whom those laws would exclude,” Scalia alleged. Arizona’s entire immigration law should be upheld, Scalia wrote, because it is “entitled” to make its own immigration policy. At one point, he cites the fact that before the Civil War, Southern states could exclude free blacks from their borders to support the idea that states should be able to set their own immigration policies. The majority of the justices, including Chief Justice John Roberts, ruled that most of Arizona’s law is unconstitutional, save for the provision that allows police officers to ask about immigration status during stops.

Noting what could be done to black folks previous to the Civil War doesn’t seem really strong argument, IMHO.

About these ads

Leave a comment

No comments yet.

Comments RSS TrackBack Identifier URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 110 other followers