Colin Powell Endorses Naive, Socialist, America-Hating, Muslim Black Candidate

POSITIVE RATINGS CHANGES SINCE 9/11/01: SUMMARY

Base: All adults

POSITIVE RATINGS    

Soon After 9/11

 

 

 

 

Feb.

2003

 

 

 

April

2003

 

 

 

Aug.

2003

 

 

 

Oct.

2003

 

 

 

Dec.

2003

 

 

 

Feb. 2004

 

 

 

 

President George Bush

88%

52%

70%

57%

59%

50%

51%

Secretary of State Colin Powell

88%

76%

81%

72%

70%

74%

65%

Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld

78%

56%

71%

55%

47%

57%

50%

Attorney General John Ashcroft

65%

51%

57%

48%

42%

51%

44%

Vice President Dick Cheney

69%

45%

55%

42%

42%

42%

41%

Republicans in Congress

67%

43%

52%

41%

40%

37%

40%

Democrats in Congress

68%

38%

39%

30%

34%

28%

33%

Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist

NA

37%

39%

32%

29%

28%

31%

House Speaker Dennis Hastert

52%

33%

41%

29%

29%

24%

26%

via Harris Interactive | The Harris Poll – Bush Approval Ratings Remain Stable; Other Leader Ratings Drop

Colin Powell was pretty much the only one to “survive” the Bush Admistration, in terms of positive public opinion.  Powell endorsed Obama for many of the reasons I raised in the title of this post.  He called out McCain for the b.s. campaign, and Palin for being an unqualified neophyte.  Powell said we should talk to our enemies and while he loves John McCain, like Joe Biden, he thinks a McCain Presidency would probably be a disaster on a number of fronts (economic, international, etc.).

Blaming The Economic Crisis on Big Poverty

That will leave a mark. It takes great intellectual cowardice, and frankly moral cowardice, to push the discredited “Teh Blacks and Mexicans caused the economic crisis” theory. In that sense, this was much deserved. The worst part is that York doesn’t even defend the theory–he just hopes we’ll buy this package marked “Blame The Niggers and Spics.” But he has no idea what’s inside the box.

It’s amazing to me that these guys continue this strategy, even as it’s clear that the demographics aren’t on their side–the country isn’t getting any whiter. But that’s small potatoes. The bigger question is philisophical. Where is the principle in this? What is “conservative” about this argument, except that it’s just anti-government?

via Matt Taibbi sons Byron York – Ta-Nehisi Coates

Some nice schooling going on over there.  The concept that the economic collapse of the United States banking system is because some poor people defaulted on their, umm, huge? mortagages, is laughable at best.

Since it has been raised by both Palin and McCain, I guess it would be uncouth to say that it’s a racist argument, particularly given Palin’s long history on race issues, but it certainly is classist as well as being completely devoid of evidence and divorced from reality.

Which is to say, it’s probably going to become a centerpoint of their campaign.