Turns out the the only thing they hate more than being called racist is our President.
Gregory Mankiw plays a small but important role in the political ecology: an accomplished Harvard professor who validates Republican economic policies. It’s almost impossible to find empirical support for debt-financed tax cuts, but when George W. Bush proposed them, Mankiw and his Harvard pedigree were there to reassure that they were “fiscally responsible” and would surely lead to higher growth. The failure of these reassurances to come true has not prompted Mankiw to reassess his thinking. That’s because the fundamental basis for his beliefs about such matters has nothing to do with economics. Mankiw believes rich people deserve to keep their money, regardless of economic consequences.
Now, many conservatives share this belief, but since it is unpopular, they instead argue that higher taxes on the rich hurt the non-rich. Mankiw, to his enormous credit, does not conceal his agenda. He lays his agenda on the table in the form of a paper, “Defending the One Percent,” explicating his beliefs. In so doing, Mankiw — perhaps admirably, or at least bravely — ventures completely outside his area of expertise, economics, into moral philosophy. The result is — well, there’s no other way to put it. It’s an embarrassing piece of ignorant tripe.
For those that aren’t aware of *why* the GOP thinks this way, here’s two more stories for you.
First up, how many people’s hatred of immigration reform is based exactly where’d you guess.
The very first video submitted was premised on the notion that immigration reform should be stopped because otherwise whites would become the minority in America.
The results were striking: The researchers’ mathematical model suggests that of the seven states in the country with the highest percentage of people who are biased against black people, six are Southern states—Louisiana, Mississippi, Texas, Alabama, Georgia, and South Carolina—required to seek federal approval for election law changes under the VRA. Arizona and Alaska, the other two states required to get the feds’ permission before changing their election laws, ranked much lower in anti-black bias. But as Elmendorf and Spencer note, these states are presumably required to seek that permission because of other bias—anti-Latino in Arizona and anti-Native American in Alaska—which their study did not measure. (Besides the eight states mentioned above, the VRA requires some counties and municipalities in seven other states to seek federal permission to change election rules.)
So, if you haven’t figure out yet why the GOP institution as an old, white, rich stereotype is destined for the trashbin of history (after some serious attempts at oppression to retain democratic power), now you know.
Not only do they represent this stereotype, they think it’s a good thing.
Obama Says Questions About Birth a Distraction From Issues – Businessweek http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-04-27/obama-says-questions-about-birth-a-distraction-from-issues.html
“Over the last two and a half years I have watched with bemusement, I’ve been puzzled at the degree to which this thing just kept on going,” he said at the White House.
The question has dominated the news in recent weeks even as the country is in the middle of a debate about the federal budget and how to cut the nation’s debt, he said. “We’re not going to be able to solve our problems if we get distracted by sideshows and carnival barkers,” the president said. “We do not have time for this kind of silliness.”
“Carnival barker” might be the best description of Trump I’ve ever seen.
BTW, did you catch how a majority of R’s are still in the wrong, factually, in this one? Now we get to see how cognitive dissonance works in real time.
UPDATE: Why this went on so long and probably isn’t done yet…